Subscribe:   Posts   |   Email   |   Facebook   |   Twitter

Internet Marketing and Web Development in Higher Education and other tidbits…

Why Everyone is Wrong About Text Messaging

17 Nov 2011

written by David Marshall

Why Everyone is Wrong About Text Messaging

As an admissions tool, text message marketing has a bad rap – a really bad rap. Each new recruitment season brings articles like this recent New York Times piece that dismiss text messaging as either ineffective or unwanted by prospectives.  As someone who has worked directly with text message campaigns in higher ed admissions for years, I can’t help but wince when reading coverage like that. Not because the truth hurts, but rather because it’s not true at all.

Contrary to popular opinion, text messaging can be an incredibly successful admissions tool – and I have the data to prove it. 

The Problem

The general argument against text messaging as a recruitment tool is that students don’t want it. Whether it’s qualitative findings, like those highlighted in the above-mentioned NY Times article, or quantitative findings from surveys like Noel Levitz annual E-Expectations Survey, critics point to the fact that a vast majority of prospective students say they simply do not want colleges or universities to communicate with them via text messaging. As an industry, we’ve taken these findings and jumped to the conclusion that if it’s not a broadly applicable tool, it’s not worth implementing.  But the fact is, text message marketing isn’t about the vast majority.

The Data

For the last three years, St. Mary’s (TX) has provided potential students the option to sign up for text updates when they first make contact with the institution. Throughout the recruitment process, students who opted-in get helpful and important text alerts, and, if they reply, the university writes back to them individually.

For example, in recent text campaign prospective students were invited to Sleeping Bag Weekend (a key recruiting event). Many students responded via text: ‘thank you’ or asked simple questions. One student specifically engaged in a conversation about the admissions process, transcripts, application and transportation to sleeping bag weekend. After all his questions were answered, he replied “..all of this texting helps a lot..”.

Screen shot 2011 11 17 at 9.49.24 AM Why Everyone is Wrong About Text Messaging

As an early adopter, St. Mary’s has been very successful, enjoying record breaking enrollment for the last three years. Texting is only one component of their multi-channel communication mix. However, a very important one. In the last year…

  • 1,923 student opted in for text updates (out of 40,000 who inquired) – but 30.8 percent of those who did ended up applying, compared with 10.9 percent of all prospective students.
  • 42% of the texting students paid a deposit to attend the university compared with 26% of all accepted students.


While one could look at the above numbers and scoff that a mere 5% of prospectives signed up for the service, they’d be missing the point entirely. Prospective students who opt in for texting are significantly more likely to apply and enroll, which makes SMS adoption an excellent early qualifying indicator. In addition, an argument could certainly be made that it is also the helpful, personal and easily accessible communication inherent in texting that can make a difference, at least among a portion of participants.

So it’s true text messaging as a recruitment tool isn’t for everyone. In fact, most inquiring students will not opt-in for these text alerts. But when 97% of students rely on texting as their own primary form of communication, and when participation in such campaigns provides a nearly instantaneous qualifying indicator, it just seems contemptible that our industry would write the technology off entirely, simply because it’s not a universally applicable tool.

The bottom line is that the data is in, and text messaging is a viable marketing tool worthy of a place in our recruitment toolkit.

This article is available in multiple languages. Read it in: Macedonian.

The content of this post is licensed: The post is released under a Creative Commons by-nc-nd 3.0 license

About the author

David Marshall

David has worked with over 100 institutions to help them better utilize technology. You may remember David as co-founder of LiquidMatrix—the company that dominated the Admissions Marketing Awards for 9 consecutive years. David led the team that developed the most widely used e-recruiting tools in the country, and the higher education web sites created are widely considered to be industry benchmarks. David has authored numerous articles on using technology to recruit students more effectively. Today, he is the founder and principal of Mongoose Research, and lead architect of the company’s mobile solutions.

This post was written by David Marshall

  • Anonymous

    Yes! Great post David. I’ve found that BoomText ( has done the best for my company with text message marketing, providing a sweet dashboard and analytics. They say text messages have a 95% read rate!

  • Daniel Staiculescu

    Text messaging is ok because it`s really faster than other types of marketing communications. But you know, it`s something new and people don`t have trust. Not yet. 

  • Zack Rosen

    I definitely agree with this article; we HAVE to be in-step with the students. They’re texting, we need to be texting.

  • Stephen Juliano

    Does anyone know what texting platform St. Mary’s uses?

    • David Marshall

      Hi Stephen – St. Mary’s uses Recruitment Plus as their CRM and Mongoose Mobile Platform as their texting platform.  The mobile platform does integrate with any ERP/CRM, however.  Hope that helps.

  • Allie Garmon

    What other texting platforms are available that are oriented towards higher education institutions and their needs?

  • chen guoxin

    I want to ask you something,’ she said suddenly. Do you know many people in London?’ 
    Yes, a great many.’  Cheap MBT Shoes or Cheap Toms Shoes all them onl 
    Many men of rank and title?’ There was an unmistakable tone of suspicion in the strange question. I hesitated about answering it.  MBT Shoes 
    Some,’ I said, after a moment’s silence. 
    Many’ — she came to a full stop, and looked me searchingly in the face — many men of the rank of Baronet?’ 
    Too much astonished to reply, I questioned her in my turn. 
    Why do you ask?’  MBT Shoes Sale and Toms Shoes Sale store online 
    Because I hope, for my own sake, there is one Baronet that you don’t know.’ 
    Will you tell me his name?’  Discount MBT Shoes online sale and Toms Outlet too 
    I can’t — I daren’t — I forget myself when I mention it.’ She spoke loudly and almost fiercely, raised her clenched hand in the air, and shook it passionately; then, on a sudden, controlled herself again, and added, in tones lowered to a whisper, Tell me which of them you know.’ MBT Shoes  
    I could hardly refuse to humour her in such a trifle, and I mentioned three names. Two, the names of fathers of families whose daughters I taught; one, the name of a bachelor who had once taken me a cruise in his yacht, to make sketches for him.  MBT Outlet shoes and Toms Shoes Online Store Sale 
    Ah! you don’t know him,’ she said, with a sigh of relief. Are you a man of rank and title yourself?’ 
    Far from it. I am only a drawing-master.’ 

Proud Member of BlogHighEd University Web Developers eduStyle

© .eduGuru - Internet Marketing and Web Development in Higher Education and other tidbits…. Powered by Wordpress. | Advertiser policy