Subscribe:   Posts   |   Email   |   Facebook   |   Twitter

Internet Marketing and Web Development in Higher Education and other tidbits…

Why You Should Ignore Pinterest (for now)

12 Jan 2012

written by Michael Fienen

Why You Should Ignore Pinterest (for now)

Blame Travis over at EMG for this article – he pulled me into this question on Facebook about what higher ed should be doing about Pinterest. It was something that shouldn’t have riled me up, and yet it did. It doesn’t help that many of you may have also caught the article over on the CASE blog about Pinterest as well, and are now wondering: “Is that for us?” It was written to showcase the work Oberlin is putting in to their Pinterest account - which I applaud their effort, if not their methods. Warning: This is a rant. You can jump to the end if you’d like to read the Storify I put together to summarize the discussion several of us had this morning on this topic.

Back around 2008 or so, I made fun of Twitter. Why the hell would people want to “microblog,” I asked. But, the idea of Twitter was pretty new and I’m nothing if not even handed (usually), so I set up an account to at least try it out before writing it off. Nearly 28,000 tweets later, I think the results of that are clear. I’m doing the same thing to Pinterest now (in criticizing its purpose and usefulness), and yes, I recognize the hypocracy in that. Pinterest is novel, sure. But I definitely think that higher ed should not be himming and hawing about whether or not to use it (to be specific, I’m talking about usage institution-wide, as a marketing and community engagement tool – as a classroom tool, that’s another discussion). Pinterest has been compared as a more visual alternative to Tumblr by some. I think for current examples, that’s a relatively fair comparison. In that light, consider this:


Remember Plurk? Do you recall how it was going to revolutionize the Twitter audience and experience, and instead mostly faded into obscurity and instead became the MySpace of microblogging? And in their defense, I do feel like Plurk was ultimately a better tool than Twitter – sometimes it’s just hard to fight the power of first-to-market. Imagine then if we’d all ran out and set up our walled gardens in Plurk, how much could have been wasted. And imagine if you’d invested time and effort into Plurk without doing the same for Twitter. That’s not to say that we shouldn’t try new things. As Dylan Wilbanks pointed out:

dylan1 Why You Should Ignore Pinterest (for now)

But also feel that there is a fundamental difference between the mentality of “We should do this because we think we can do something new and awesome” and “I wonder if we should do this new thing because it seems cool and trendy and might be popular later.” Much of higher ed falls in to the latter group, in my experience. Being a pioneer is hard. I like hard, but it’s a rare place that can always innovate, and always try new things, and be successful enough at it to keep it up (*cough*Google*cough*). The other thing to consider is that we’re just now really settling in to our social media properties. For most institutions this is Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube, with a few branching out into LinkedIn, Google+ and Tumblr as well. In the case of Plurk/Twitter above, how wise do you think it would be to invest effort into Pinterest without first having gotten the hang of Tumblr? I know that’s a fragile discussion, as first-to-market is no guarantee (just ask Friendster and MySpace), but it’s certainly a good place to start and ride it out until the community at large tires of it in some cases.

And that brings me to the core issue.

Do less better.

If you can’t sit there and tell me that you’re at all the “common” spots, and that you’re doing great at them, then why would you consider branching out even farther? I won’t fault you for name reserving an account just in case, but if you are investing time and effort into setting up a presence there, are you prepared to break down what that investment is worth? In the case of Pinterest, the largest part of the audience is currently women between the ages of 25 and 34. Is that your target audience? Is that time more valuable than other methods of sharing user generated content through existing networks and tools? If you are established on Facebook and Twitter, we now have the resources to really dig in to the value and opportunity in those channels. That gives you the luxury of being able to wait a bit on Pinterest and see just where it is six to twelve months from now. That’s not being overly cautious or lazy, that’s being strategic. That’s showing that you know you have limited resources for community engagement, and that you’d much rather put them to use where it’s worth the most. As Krisna put it:

krisnap1 Why You Should Ignore Pinterest (for now)

Think about your core questions: who, what, when, where, why, how. In the long run, some brands will likely find successful ways of using it. But you must remember that the more specific your audience and community is, the more specific your strategy for them should be. For us, consider:

  • WHO do you plan to reach on the site? WHO will be your voice on the site?
  • WHAT do you expect to share, produce, or facilitate? WHAT does the audience expect to get?
  • WHEN are you going to plug it into your workflow/editorial cycles?
  • WHERE are you going to get or find content at? WHERE will this fit into other existing strategies.
  • WHY are you investing the time here, instead of at X, Y, or Z?
  • HOW will you promote and create value in your new property? HOW will you add value to the channel?

One of the best uses I could see for Pinterest would be at a school that has highly visual arts or similar programs. Pinterest is a visual medium, and certain programs on an individual basis could find promotional success there. If you want to jump in, that’s where to start. Be strategic about your use, and pioneer creative marketing techniques tailored to the items you’re selling. Institution wide? No. Have a plan, have KPIs (key performance indicators), define how it fits your marketing and customer service strategy. Yes, you can curate and share other user generated content about the school too, but Pinterest is hardly unique in enabling that kind of functionality. How do you plan on adding value to the channel? Bottom line, if you feel like you must do it, be smart about it. It’s hard to learn from a failure when you didn’t have a plan to begin with. If you at least go in with some kind of strategy, come success or failure you can learn from the situation and do better next time.

It’s almost like higher ed is developing ADHD. So many were slow or late to the social media game, that there is now a panic that we’ll miss a boat (hint: you will miss boats. It’s going to happen. It’s not the end of the world). It’s like our immune system responded to Web 2.0 by overreacting. It’s okay to pace yourself and move slowly, as long as you’re also smart about it, and not putting it off just because you want to wait for waiting’s sake. In the end, if you’re asking “Should I be on service X,” then the answer is likely no, because it means that you already don’t have any idea what you’d do there (in the case of Pinterest, you’re going to mainly be sharing and promoting community generated content. Why do you need Pinterest to do that?). Instead, focus your efforts on being successful with The Big Three (FB, Twitter, YT), and wait until you’re comfortable enough to be smart and agile within the bigger sandbox.

I know this sounds like the “Twitter? Why Would I Want That?” conversation all over again. But I personally believe it’s much closer to the lessons learned from services like Plurk. We need to get used to the fact that new services will quickly become a dime a dozen, and it will be much more important to be smart about our resource investments rather than putting a hand into every single basket that comes up. Several of these points and a lot more are discussed in the Storify below. Feel free to share your thoughts in the comments section.

Photo credit: cc icon attribution small Why You Should Ignore Pinterest (for now) Some rights reserved by optikfluffel

The content of this post is licensed: The post is released under a Creative Commons by-nc-sa 3.0 license

About the author

Michael Fienen

For six years, Michael served as the Director of Web Marketing at Pittsburg State University. Currently, he is the Senior Interactive Developer at Aquent and is also CTO for the interactive map provider nuCloud. When it comes to web communication, he focuses very heavily on interpersonal communication components of websites, as well as content considerations that must be taken into account when building usable sites.  He is an active supporter of the dotCMS community, accessibility advocate, consultant, internationally featured speaker on web issues, and general purpose geek who wears many hats.

Michael's Facebook Michael's LinkedIn Michael's UWebD Profile Michael's Twitter Michael's Flickr Michael's YouTube Michael's FoursquareProfile Michael's Lanyrd Profile Michael's Tumblr Account Michael's Slideshare Profile

This post was written by - who has written 99 posts on .eduGuru

  • Anonymous

    I’d have to agree. It is really tough to recommend adopting another platform especially when so many teams are still building out proper Facebook and Twitter strategies.

  • Travis

    Michael, thanks for the mention, blame, etc. Glad to have been able to stir a much needed topic on this week’s shiny object and overall social media strategy as well.

  • Emily Summey

    Through all of these comments, the purpose of Pinterest was somewhat ignored. Women (mostly) are using the boards to organize and inspire their lives. I see an organic benefit for higher ed. Imagine a high schooler (or their parent) creating a pin board for prospective colleges. They pin the items that most appeal to them at specific schools. All of a sudden your website is being repinned and liked and spread – without having to do anything.

    I have seen plenty of higher ed references floating through Pinterest, already, and I’m certain the institutions had nothing to do with it. In the fashion section – team branded apparel. In the wedding section – groom’s cakes based on campus architecture/icons (Aggie ring, etc.).

    Colleges shouldn’t waste their time managing a Pinterest presence. Rather, have your student ambassadors create a board focused on your school. Go through the preliminary pinning process (it won’t take long at all), tag it as “Education,” and let the rest happen automatically.

    • Michael Fienen

      You hit on a key difference though, the value is not in how WE take part in it, but rather the value users get from using our content there. But we are extremely limited in just how we can affect that kind of behavior. You can encourage folks, maybe a conditional popup reminding folks, add a share link on pages. And even then you open the debate of why you’d promote doing that on Pinterest vs. any other tool.

  • Jeff Dodd

    Seems that I was the original instigator of this question. I posed it to the EMG Online Facebook page on Tuesday ( after having posed the question to my subscribers of my university’s page earlier in the day ( Reaction from users was pretty evenly split. Several people thought we should definitely be on Pinterest, but didn’t give great reasons why or how they’d like us to interact with them there. Another group thought our current social media channels were more than adequate for them to keep in touch with the university.

    Until I was appointed as manager of communication and social media for the university, our presence in the channel was haphazard (not that I’m a guru of social media organization, but I do try to keep an eye on things). Some of our presences, including Facebook, were started by students, student workers, etc. — just the folks you would expect would seize on new trends. It has taken us a while to gain a handle on things. In fact, our Linked in page is still operated by an alumna. I wanted to ensure that the university’s presence on Pinterest was owned, in fact, by the university and will definitely set up a brand page so the name isn’t hijacked by someone else (if, indeed it hasn’t already been). Once out there, something needs to be done with it, if only to refer viewers to our other pages. Frankly, to me, it smacks of flavor-of-the-day pursuits. I definitely agree with one of the tweeters who said that many times we have enough to keep up with on Facebook (love it) and Twitter (hate it) — add into that mix YouTube, Wikipedia, and LinkedIn and you have yourself a pretty full day…not to mention most of are trying to do any number of two or three dozen other job functions in a workday.

    I am surprised that the question lead to as much debate as it has. I like that so many folks are weighing in on the topic. Reading the tweets and this blog points out that social media has really come of age and that we are now being discerning consumers of it rather than early adopters of the next new thing.

  • Mallory Wood

    *sits back and waits* – my approach to Pinterest.

    Thanks for a great article Fienen. Lots of excellent insight and your point “Do less better” is my biggest takeaway. This post could apply to any new shiny object, not just Pinterest. 

    I’m not “for” or “against” Pinterest at this point. But I think (as you pointed out) an institution needs to examine the resources being spent on other social networks and if there is a high ROI. I’d never recommend an institution dive into the newest social network until they’ve established themselves and are seeing the type of engagement they want on more popular platforms where it is proven they (the industry) will have an audience. New social tools need to be strategically evaluated and eventually incorporated into a broader marketing plan. 

    At the moment there are many other opportunities that some institutions aren’t taking advantage of that, in my opinion, would have a much higher ROI than Pinterest. Like… video. 

    Yes, *someone* has to try it out first. But I think most higher ed marketers don’t have the resources to be that someone. If you have those resources, then by all means. Go for it.

  • chen guoxin

    I want to ask you something,’ she said suddenly. Do you know many people in London?’ 
    Yes, a great many.’  Cheap MBT Shoes or Cheap Toms Shoes all them onl 
    Many men of rank and title?’ There was an unmistakable tone of suspicion in the strange question. I hesitated about answering it.  MBT Shoes 
    Some,’ I said, after a moment’s silence. 
    Many’ — she came to a full stop, and looked me searchingly in the face — many men of the rank of Baronet?’ 
    Too much astonished to reply, I questioned her in my turn. 
    Why do you ask?’  MBT Shoes Sale and Toms Shoes Sale store online 
    Because I hope, for my own sake, there is one Baronet that you don’t know.’ 
    Will you tell me his name?’  Discount MBT Shoes online sale and Toms Outlet too 
    I can’t — I daren’t — I forget myself when I mention it.’ She spoke loudly and almost fiercely, raised her clenched hand in the air, and shook it passionately; then, on a sudden, controlled herself again, and added, in tones lowered to a whisper, Tell me which of them you know.’ MBT Shoes  
    I could hardly refuse to humour her in such a trifle, and I mentioned three names. Two, the names of fathers of families whose daughters I taught; one, the name of a bachelor who had once taken me a cruise in his yacht, to make sketches for him.  MBT Outlet shoes and Toms Shoes Online Store Sale 
    Ah! you don’t know him,’ she said, with a sigh of relief. Are you a man of rank and title yourself?’ 
    Far from it. I am only a drawing-master.’ 

  • Laura Bauer

    Yes this pinboard is a pinterest alternative under

  • Pingback: The enchanting yes; the essential no | Higher Ed Marketing

Proud Member of BlogHighEd University Web Developers eduStyle

© .eduGuru - Internet Marketing and Web Development in Higher Education and other tidbits…. Powered by Wordpress.